[This paper was originally written for ECON 3499 - Independent Study in Austrian Economics]

Two Theories of the Entrepreneur in Austrian Economics

The role of the entrepreneur is one of the most pivotal elements in the economic theories of the Austrian School.  The entrepreneurial nature of the market cited by Austrians is alone sufficient to distinguish their theories from orthodox economics.  Instead of a set of static equilibrium models with pristine assumptions, the Austrians elucidate an emergent market revolving around the dynamic actions of entrepreneurs in an uncertain environment, a perpetual state of disequilibrium.  Professors Joseph Schumpeter and Israel Kirzner, two of the most prominent entrepreneurial theorists, both agree on the fundamental role of the entrepreneur in the market process, and that economics ought to focus on disequilibrium.  However, they interpret the function and purpose of the entrepreneur in two starkly contrasting ways.  Schumpeter argued that it is a small cluster of entrepreneur-innovators that cause disequilibrium in the market with revolutionary new inventions, and that this unstable process will ultimately morph capitalism out of existence.  Kirzner both incorporates the entrepreneurial nature of the market to a broader range of human action, and takes an optimistic approach, arguing that the entrepreneur instead alleviates disequilibrium and brings the market closer to equilibrium and economic harmony.

Continue reading »

This is a long rant, and there’s no hiding that, but it is critically important. People are not aware that there is a double standard within academics – that which is taught versus that which is true. Social sciences are a method of control if not learned properly, and it is almost never learned properly.

In our culture, truth takes a backseat to political convenience. Conclusions are drawn for the public by the talking heads. Dissent is unpatriotic. Going against the grain, no matter how right you are, and how wrong they are, is looked down upon. You will be branded a heretic, a traitor, and a crackpot.

This is my story, with a focus on Austrian Economics. I live this double standard every day in class, on tests, and in conversations with my peers. I can explain Keynesian & Neoclassical economics that I am taught, but I tell the truth–the Austrian perspective–whenever I can get away with it.

The morals:
*Think for yourself.
*Do not take what you learn/are told at face value (including what I say!)
*Always question, always reason, always test
*Truth is elusive and emergent, never established and static
*Thought control is more prevalent than you think.
*Be a nerd.

Follow these things and you are my hero, and the hero of humanity.

Continue reading »

Tagged with:
 

What Does Anarchy Really Mean?

On 1 September 2009, in philosophy, politics, by Ryan

Every political ideology since the dawn of time has suffered from exaggerations and false impressions, either from a layman’s innocent confusion or through strategic deception by rival ideologies seeking to discredit it.  Perhaps no political idea has ever been more falsely understood, so hopelessly marginalized, and so pretentiously reprimanded than that of anarchy.

Continue reading »

In Defense of [Austrian] Economics

On 22 July 2009, in economics, by Ryan

“The habit of talking and writing about economic affairs without having probed relentlessly to the bottom of their problems has taken the zest out of public discussions on questions vital to human society and diverted politics into paths that lead directly to the destruction of all civilization…Our contemporaries consider that anything which comes under the heading of Economics…is fair game to the unqualified critic….[E]ven those whose activities have, notoriously, often led to failure and bankruptcy, enjoy a spurious prestige as economists which should at all costs be destroyed…It is time these amateurs were unmasked.” Ludwig von Mises[1]

First Impressions of Economics*

What do you think of when you hear “economics?”  Perhaps you imagine a middle-aged man with thick-rimmed glasses and a Ph.D pointing to graphs and a long list of financial equations.  Or maybe you think it’s just the wicked “science of money.”  Odds are, if you pictured something like that, you’ve got a lot of company.

Economics has a bad reputation – it is mind-numbingly boring, filled with incomprehensible jargon, graphs of a bunch of curved lines, a morass of equations, and it seems the only thing all economists are always concerned with are “the latest numbers.”  The average person is overwhelmed by the complexities, but in addition, they may also feel a hint of universal awe and wonder–The thought that “these things must be incredibly important!” may linger among your distaste.  Of course, we’re all aware that topics like unemployment, wages, and taxes certainly do affect all of us, and we all have some conception, however vague, of the forces of “supply” and “demand.”  We know that these things are important, but due to their seemingly complicated nature, it’s probably best left to those who can comprehend their complexities (and withstand their dullness!). Economics has become applied mathematics, and the economist is merely a glorified statistician.

But it is all a farce, a clever ruse! Economics is both tremendously fascinating and commonsensical so that the average layman can appreciate it!

Continue reading »

Tagged with: