“A man shouldn’t believe in an -ism, he should believe in himself.” -Ferris Bueller’s Day Off

Ever since I first saw Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, which I admit was far too late in my young life, and I heard Ferris say that line in the beginning, I was amazed.  I wrote it down, thinking to myself, how can such a cliche pop-comedy movie possibly espouse such a profoundly philosophical idea?  Regardless, I took the idea to heart.

Labeling is always a hassle.  Words have generally agreed upon definitions through intersubjective consensus, but in the realm of politics and philosophy, words are almost meaningless.  Ask a so-called “conservative” whether he believes in global interventionism:  If he says yes, he might now be a “neoconservative,” if no, he might now be a “paleoconservative.”  Ask a “liberal” if she favors wealth redistribution: If she says yes, she’s likely a “socialist,” if no, she’s might be a “libertarian.”  But of course, all of these people still label themselves “conservatives” and “liberals,” and only a select few will identify with such narrow and nuanced terms as “civil libertarian,” “communitarian,” or “anarchosyndicalist,” even if their views seem to “objectively” (whatever that means) line up with common definitions of them.

For a while now I have styled myself as an “anarchocapitalist,” or ancap for short.  I have come here to repudiate that word, it is a terrible word and I have fallen out of favor with it.  Much of this diatribe will be against the word itself, not necessarily the ideas behind it, which I tend to maintain, though I have broadened the horizons of my beliefs as well as expanded my outlook on things.

Continue reading »

Law, order, stability, trade, property-rights, writing, pottery, agriculture, these are all elements that we strongly associate with “civilization.”  The mainstream paradigm that we are all taught in history is that the great ancient civilizations flourished because their leaders were “wise” and “virtuous” governors of their people.  The great empires of old had constructed such wondrous public works, transportation systems, and law codes under the sage-like guidance of the imperial State.

But new empirical evidence, backed by libertarian economic theory shatters this paradigm.  In fact, each and every one of these facets of civilization were developed naturally, through anarchic forces long before States.  In fact, human civilization pre-dates the State by over 4,000 years. Let us investigate the fascinating truths uncovered about the Neolithic Revolution.[1]

Continue reading »

- – - – - – - – - -

What is law?  What is justice?  What makes a “good law” and what is a “bad law”?  Are we obliged to follow a bad law?  Are we obliged to follow law at all?  Is disobedience moral?  Is law necessary for society?  What would the law in a free society look like?  These are just some of the questions that I’ll answer in my Law & Justice series.

In Part I: Ethics and Natural Law, we’ll derive the origins of law by examining human nature and the theory of natural rights, as well as form a simple code of ethics for a theory of law to abide by.

- – - – - – - – - -

Continue reading »